The DNA of Jurassic Park

We spent a day at Frontier Developments in Cambridge and played Jurassic World: Evolution!

Book Now!


Featured Article

Velociraptor (Film Universe)
There are three distinct variations of Velociraptor which were cloned by InGen, not counting sexual dimorphism seen within each individual version. However, despite the surface level variations, each sub-species remains relatively similiar in terms of physical attributes. Each species is roughly 6 feet tall…

Read More

Colin Trevorrow Confirms Someone Has Guessed the Title of Jurassic World 3 – but What Is It?

As we continue to approach the start of filming for Jurassic World 3, it is safe to say that there is a lot of excited speculation within the fandom about what the title of Jurassic World 3 may be. Whilst we know that the working title of the film is Arcadia, as confirmed by production weekly, we know that this will not be the final title for the film.

There has been lots of speculation in the fandom about the nature of the name of the new film – and recently, Jurassic community member James Ronan shared a great thread on Twitter which Colin Trevorrow actually got involved in – adding fuel to the speculation fire – and eventually confirming fans within the thread have guessed the title.

Colin’s involvement within the thread involved teasing fans, before adding some additional context to some of the titles. Whilst he replied to some, such as ‘Jurassic World 3: Duel of Fates’, to poke fun at some of the ideas which fans were throwing out, he did also offer some hints about the direction which the title of the third entry in the film series may be taking.

While the above tweet isn’t from Colin, it is part of the thread, and one of the few Colin liked within it. Considering that, it stands to reason the title will be something more hopeful. Another thing Colin did confirm on this thread was that ‘Jurassic World: Extinction’ will NOT be the title of the new film. I must admit, I was slightly disappointed to read this as I and several other fans had been excited about the prospect of ‘Extinction’ being an obvious new subtitle for the series – as it was nearly the title of Jurassic Park 3 – but it does now bring into question where exactly we may be heading next. There were several fantastic suggestions within the thread such as ‘Paradigm Shifts’, New Era and ‘Welcome to Jurassic World’ – all of which I personally really appreciate as they have they communicate the current nature of the franchise well. Other great suggestions included ‘Jurassic World: The Edge of Chaos’ and ‘Jurassic World: Paradise Lost’ – though they skew less positive sounding, and more grim.

So you’re probably now thinking ‘but I saw people saying Colin Trevorrow confirmed the title is ‘New Era’. He didn’t. While that title is the current running theory, as it was guessed within the thread, and reads in a positive way, Colin’s tweet using the words dates back to the Summer, regarding a very different topic.

The running theory is Colin chose the words New Era on purpose, as an easter egg of sorts, that would only come to light after the title of the film is announced. It wouldn’t be the first time he did that – in past interviews with Jurassic Outpost, he snuck direct quotes from the Fallen Kingdom script into his answers to our questions. However, only time will tell!

‘Jurassic World: New Era’ or not, these titles should have one thing in common – they suggest that the title should reflect the new nature of the third instalment in the series now that we are off Isla Nublar, and well within the domain of the general population. Short features like Battle at Big Rock and The Jurassic World Motion Comics have provided tantalising hints at the nature of the world after the fallout from Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom – so this is something which I feel should be further emphasized in the title of the third film. It is safe to say that the stakes which we are facing within the upcoming sequel are the most extreme they have been within the franchise so far – so I am hopeful that the title will reflect the change in scale and scope which we are likely to see when this film debuts in cinemas everywhere next year.

Battle at Big Rock Graphic

Equally, however, the title may be something much more on the nose like ‘Jurassic Park: The New World’ – hinting at the more open and ‘new’ nature of the franchise moving forwards. With Universal Pictures ramping up the amount of energy Jurassic is getting, and with more toy-line and spin-off materials than ever before, I think that this film may be used as a springboard to debut a new world of Jurassic content – functioning as an ending to the story saga we have followed, but also as a new start for wherever the franchise may go in the future.  It’s safe to say that we could speculate over the title all day – but, at the end of the day, it is just a title – and it may not even directly hint to what happens within the film but may be something much subtler, so we will have to wait and see how the title eventually ties into the film.

With all this said – I’m eager to hear what you are all thinking about Jurassic World 3. What do you hope the title of this new entry in the saga will be? And what are you hoping the film will explore thematically? Let us know in the comments below, and stay tuned for more news on Jurassic World 3 as soon as we get it!


68 thoughts on “Colin Trevorrow Confirms Someone Has Guessed the Title of Jurassic World 3 – but What Is It?

  1. Given that New Era is a very prominent hat company with plenty of copyright protection on the term “New Era”, I can’t imagine that’s what they’re going with. Bet it’s something along those lines though.

  2. I’ll be surprised if it isn’t “Jurassic World: New Era”. It sounds great, suits the story trajectory, someone guessed it within the thread, and Colin used it in that tweet from above. Someone else guessed “Edge of Chaos”, which could work but doesn’t sound as catchy.

  3. Duel of the fates would be hilarious. (for those who don’t know, that was Trevorrow’s original star wars episode 9 title before he was replaced by JJ)

  4. Jurassic World 3: Life Finds A Way, When Dinosaurs Ruled The Earth.
    I really hope there will be, in Jurassic World 3:
    -The Jurassic World 3 introduction scene similar to that of Jurassic Park 3 where “Park” is replaced by “World”.
    -Blue meeting Alan Grant where the latter, at first distrusts her but later learns to trust her and ends up teaming up with Blue (with Barry too) when the latter asks him for help, for save Owen Grady or something else. Alan Grant would also use his velociraptor resonance chamber (seen in Jurassic Park 3) for communicate with Blue and also for call her (and possibly other velociraptors as well) when threatened by a predator, and/or bad guys or other kind of help.
    -Blue with a male velociraptor similar to those of Jurassic Park 3, where in the end they mate and have offspring. But especially that Blue doesn’t die.
    -Rexy/Roberta (or other tyrannosaurus like Junior, the young T-rex from The Lost World Jurassic Park) fights and defeats the spinosaurus of JP3 (perhaps accompanied by this music of Jurassic Park 3 “clash of extinction”) in the midst of many terrified people fleeing the battle full of noise and destruction (fall of trees and / or destruction of buildings ). And after defeating the spinosaurus, the t-rex roars victoriously as in the final scene of Jurassic Park under the gaze of many people. But above all, no dying t-rex, and no killed t-rex.
    -A meeting between Alan Grant (with Ian Malcom and Ellie Sattler) and Rexy/Roberta: Rexy recognizes Alan by the smell, while Grant recognizes Rexy by his scars caused by a velociraptor in Jurassic Park. At first Grant was afraid, but reassured himself shortly afterwards by remembering that it was this t-rex that had saved him before. After an exchange of calm and respectful glances, Rexy leaves calmly, leaving Alan and the others reassured and happy.
    -The suchomimus, Tarbosaurus, Ornithocheirus (with a wingspan of 12 meters), and some brachiosaurs in a scene similar to that of Jurassic Park 3 “Brachiosaurus on the Bank” ; and the mosasaur attacking and killing the whalers.

    1. Listen, you don’t need to list all of your bad ideas every time you make a comment. I hate to be rude, but it’s getting annoying.

      1. Already not only are you rude, but also insolent. It is your criticisms and remarks that are bad, I have the right to express my ideas in my comments, so respect.

        1. Just because you have the right doesn’t mean you need to. Your ‘ideas’ are god awful and pretty much everyone agrees on that do why keep wasting everyone’s time with it? Not to mention attacking anyone who calls you out on how awful they are despite how civil they’re being.

          1. No, your comments and criticisms are horrible, not my ideas! And whether I need to express my ideas or not, doesn’t matter, I’m free to express them. It is you who waste your time trying to prevent me from expressing my ideas and attacking me as soon as I protest against your rude and clumsy criticisms.

          1. No, it is you who send spam, harassing me with you criticisms and remarks as useless as rude! So leave me alone! Stop!

          2. I’m almost laughing picturing you sputtering about this. Look, nobody is harassing you. You are accusing people who are being perfectly polite of attacking you, while attacking them yourself! “No, it is you who spam” “your comments and criticisms are horrible”. Plus you accuse our arguments of being “clumsy” and “horrible”. I’ve been trying to avoid pointing this out, because your response is obvious, but your grammar is just plain terrible. Maybe there is a reason for that, but check yourself before you spew insults.

          3. You may not see it, but the fact that you persist in telling me that I “spam” “horrible comments and criticism” and “terrible grammar” are only proof that you insult me severely. It’s very easy to criticize when you don’t take the time to analyze carefully. So if you believe that you are going to prevent me by severely criticizing my comments and ideas, you are completely mistaken, I would only persist, as you persist in calling my ideas “spam, horrible”. So it’s up to you to check yourself carefully before spitting rude criticism and other insults at which you deny sending me. The next time you answer, please take it into account even if you don’t like it, and avoid all that I could consider as insults and other forms of provocation, and I could perhaps make an effort to answer you. without aggressiveness.

          4. This has escalated ridiculously quickly, sad you and I can’t talk any sense into the fool, eh? Oh well I suppose the little brat will keep spamming and think it’s like standing up for a righteous cause in their mind.
            Best to just ignore the damn foolish thing now.

          5. No it’s you who got ridiculously degenerate quickly, and I can’t make sense of rude people like you! I gave you a chance to respond politely but you chose war! You assume “the little brat will keep spamming and think it’s like standing up for a righteous cause in their mind.”, but the truth is you don’t know anything: the little kid is you, otherwise, if you you are a mature adult, you should respond politely with moderation, caution and indulgence (spelling), which unfortunately is not the case! Better just ignore your regrettable damn answers, and let this debate end right now, if you do not prove very clearly that you are not capable of showing politeness, moderation, humility and indulgence! Thank you for your understanding!

    2. Seriously please stop with this nonsense. None of these ideas will make it into the movie they have little to no plot value or break continuity (as if that’s stopped the writers from doing the same). At least you didn’t bring up the god awful Megalodon idea again…

      1. This “nonsense” that you evoke has no meaning. You cannot know if my ideas will not appear in the film, just as you know nothing of their value of intrigue or rupture of continuity. And even if you are right; in no way will it prevent me from expressing my ideas. And nobody will dissuade me from it.

        1. Obviously you don’t know the meaning of ‘constructive criticism’ or how people actually have a conversation. Yes you are entitled to your opinion however people are also allowed to say, politely thus far- you’ll know when I’m being rude, why they disagree with your ‘ideas’ as well as if they are tired of hearing them.
          Throwing several hissy fits after misidentifying rudeness proves nothing, nor does it help your case- in fact it hinders your credibility as well as shortens people’s patience with your self-entitled attitude.
          So please continue your tirades against your so-called ‘attacks’ it just proves how immature you really are.

          1. To say to me that I am “immature”, that one denies the “attacks” by qualifying them “so-called ‘attacks'” and to qualify my conversations of “tirades”, is for me the proofs that one attacks me severely and no politeness, i’m still aware that i don’t share my ideas, but it’s not a reason to describe them as if they were all and entirely stupid (even if maybe they are more or less , but what guarantees that those of others are less so?). And to say to me that “Throwing several hissy fits after misidentifying rudeness” does not prove any advantage of politeness. How does this not hinder your credibility and shorten people’s patience for your self-entitled ? So thank you for taking into account that as unpleasant as my lines are, to answer me by sparing myself of all that I could consider as insults and provocations, and I could perhaps make an effort to take note of your arguments.

          2. Jeezus what the f**k kind of spastic, lack of any form of grammar, clearly desperate response was THAT.
            I can’t breathe from laughing at how quickly you’ve spiraled into complete nonsense COURTY it’s truly astonishing and proves your your limited mental capacity.
            So keep thinking you’re fighting to keep ‘your opinion’ but you’ve already lost because you’re just so pathetic. Do yourself a favor and grow up.
            Oh and just for the record- THAT is what an actual attack looks like you whiny, sheltered, pathetic little brat.

          3. “the f**k kind of spastic, lack of any form of grammar, clearly desperate response”.
            I cannot breathe in front of your insolence, your severe insults and completely unacceptable perversity: “laughing” “spiraled into complete nonsense” and ‘proves your your limited mental capacity’; IT’S YOUR mental capacity and your politeness THAT is limited, NOT MINE! Otherwise you should have shown politeness, moderation, humility and indulgence, which unfortunately is not the case.
            I keep “my opinion”, it is true, but it is you who have already lost because you are not only so pathetic but also terribly rude and severely insolent. I had given you a chance to respond with politeness, moderation, humility and indulgence. TAKE IT INTO ACCOUNT! It is up to you to grow by improving your language and your behavior as a gentleman if you hold on as long as you are given credibility and reason.
            And for the record, THAT IS what a real attack looks like: the little brat, the greenhorn, rude, insolent, immature, and boorish who calls me “whiny, sheltered, pathetic little brat”.
            If you want this debate to be finished for good, I would not repeat it to you a second time, here is how I will accept your answer: above all with POLITENESS, MODERATION, HUMILITY and INDULGENCE; so NO RUDENESS, NO INSULTS, and NO INSOLENCE PLEASE!
            Thank you for your understanding!

          4. Just because you string together a bunch of big words and talk down to me doesn’t mean a damn thing- only proves your own insecurities and ignorance at how the world works.
            I sure as hell don’t have to ‘behave as a gentleman’ because I only do so to those that deserve it- that is not you, you don’t deserve the respect you’re demanding because you yourself have not given it. Golden rule, even a sheltered self-proclaimed ‘gentleman’ like yourself must know of it.
            So thank YOU for understanding you’re only being treated as you have treated me.
            If you can’t see that then I truly pity you.

          5. THAT’S ENOUGH ! THIS IS TOO MUCH! I HAVE MORE THAN ENOUGH OF YOU! I no longer want to receive harassment and lies from you due to your incorrigible and stubborn insolence! So STOP, you are just wasting your time, especially by pretending that you are not swinging bad words at me, and by pretending that you did not start attacking me first!
            It is your own insecurities and ignorance that you prove by obstinately answering me rudely: you claim to know the golden rules of the conduct of an honest gentleman but you do not set an example at all: I have known people more polite and more forgiving than you in a debate of this kind!
            I did not send a comment with my ideas just to be treated rudely, and exchange dishonest words! We can have the right not to like them and not to approve them, but from there to answer by calling me ignorant or even stupid, it is totally UNACCEPTABLE!
            However, I can recognize that some of the ideas in my comment may indeed not be included in Jurassic World 3 (for example: Tarbosaurus, Ornithocheirus). But as for the potential titles although apparently it is fixed, in what can we say that “Life Finds A Way” could be completely unworthy (seeing that it is already part of the list of ideas of titles to which includes “When Dinosaurs Ruled The Earth”)?

          6. Getting crazy in here and I haven’t even been around for a while 😛
            COURTY should be free to express his wild and childish hopes. They totally suck, but hey, I think JW totally sucks! COURTY couldn’t hurt it more than it’s already hurt itself.

          7. Ok guys, please stop. even if we make him shut it, it won’t be worth all this. Just drop it. And COURTY, don’t paste that thing in here again. We’ve all seen it by now.

          8. @Ben
            The issue here isn’t about opinions, it’s about how they were expressed and how any further comment was met with unnecessary hostility. Yes COURTY is allowed their opinion, I never said otherwise I just expressed that had been overdone at this point even if that’s not what they understood.
            Either way this the last I’m saying on this entire matter.
            It’s been an exercise in futility.

      1. “All” to designate what is bad is very clumsily to use especially without arguments, politeness, and serious and meticulous research. And if you believe that by telling me to stop I will do it, you are completely mistaken, because for me it would be more of provocation.

          1. No it is you who attack me, and in addition to being rude since you insult me ​​severely, it is you who are terribly stupid in believing you smarter than me! So stop, leave me alone once and for all! I didn’t ask you for anything!


      Your reactions are obviously of someone who has been sheltered and coddled, that has been told they are special, and has had no form of conflict due to this sheltering. Your wish for nothing to die and everything to have a happy ending is already proof of that.
      Well guess what?
      Life ain’t like that at all and someone needs to give you a severe wake up call because without it the real world, that you are obviously unfamiliar with, will chew you up and spit you out. You keep saying no one gave you a chance for polite response- that is the furthest thing from the truth and if you we’re so ignorant you’d realize that. You clearly have much to learn about a great many things, such as how to discern the difference between a conversation and rudeness (I did give you a lovely example to help with that- I’m more than willing to give further examples of true rudeness if need be.). Am I being rude right now? Slightly. See? There’s things you obviously don’t grasp and would help you greatly to learn. Life isn’t black and white the way you’re trying to view it.
      So go ahead, keep lashing out because you’ve yet to learn many of life’s lessons- just know that it’s on your own head not mine, not Benn’s, not truejpfan’s, not anyone else’s. Hopefully one day this attempt at a lesson will sink in and you will be a better person for it.

      1. Already in what to call me an ignorant is politeness?
        Yes, there are some things that maybe I don’t know, but don’t think (although it already is) that I’m not usually undercover, especially when faced with someone who, even if he doesn’t don’t approve of my ideas, politely responds!
        But I do not hide from you that when I feel offended, it is very difficult for me to be lenient and to respond very calmly.
        Because do not think above all that I like to fight in debates which rage, so much it is tiring!
        It is not impossible that I have things to learn; but perhaps you too can learn that not everyone reacts positively to certain types of responses where some might take it more for provocation than advice.
        Thank you for your understanding.

        1. You keep using the word ‘debate’- there is no debate going on.
          The fact of the matter is that you saw everything anyone said as an attack, therefore your responses simply fueled the fire and you have yet to see that or admit it.
          Until you see this for yourself it’s honestly best you stop talking down to people and flying off the handle- those two don’t mix.
          It is not just my comments you took offense too, each of us were initially polite (as I have explained tho you have yet to understand that which honestly is your own fault and the fuel to this fire), so while perhaps both of us must learn the best thing you can do is to learn what constructive criticism looks like, as well as when you take things too far and people are simply fed up with you.
          If you had simply apologized from the beginning, as we all asked (the word PLEASE is the full proof of politeness and each of us used it) for you to calm down and basically condense your wishes- instead you took offense and attacked. That in turn caused others to attack you.
          Hopefully you learn from all this.

          1. – Without wanting to provoke you, it is difficult for me to believe that there was no debate.
            -I agree to stop definitively once I feel that we are rather in agreement.
            -About comments, what do you have to offer so that I can say what I think by trying to be polite if possible?
            -Without wanting to offend you, you just have to be careful not to confuse “criticism” and “offense”, although you may already know it, so know (although this is already the case) that when I felt that, for me, you had gone too far, it is true that I was fed up with you. Please be careful not to speak of “people” as if it were everyone, because it was just about certain people.
            -Maybe you did not doubt it, but it is true that it is very difficult for me to apologize as soon as I feel offended (certainly that the word PLEASE is the complete proof of the politeness, and if it is true that you used it, but if I attacked you, it is because there were for me certain words which was in my opinion offensive, otherwise I would not have reacted thus .)
            -Hope you will understand that.

    4. I really ought not to get involved in this shenanigans…but I’m an idiot, so here’s my take on all of this, however in vain it may be in the end.

      1. The intro scene. What’s the point of it being similar to JP3’s opening?

      2. Grant meeting Blue. I’ll be honest, this is the only thing on this list that MIGHT actually happen in the movie. Dr. Grant’s an expert on Velociraptors, and it makes sense that he’d meet the JW franchise’s star raptor. So at a conceptual level, I can see it happening. Everything else…not so much. The raptor resonance chamber only served to confuse the JP3 raptors in the end, and that was it. In fact, one of them even tried to attack the group before the alpha female snarled him down. And how exactly would Blue “ask” for Grant’s help?

      3. While it would be nice to see JP3 styled raptors make a comeback, I highly doubt it’ll actually happen. Don’t get your hopes up.

      4. Rex vs. Spino rematch. Oh for crying out loud, can we just let this die already? So a Spinosaurus killed a T-Rex back in 2001. So what? Honestly, this is something that I think the fandom at large needs to get over. It wasn’t even a tyrannosaur we knew, like Rexy or Buck or Doe. It was just some random sub-adult male that was too stupid to back down from the Spino.

      5. Why on Earth would Rexy care about Alan or the others? She didn’t “save” them, she just pounced on the raptors and COINCIDENTALLY saved the cast’s life. She doesn’t care about people at all, much less someone she tried to kill and eat 20+ years ago. Do tyrannosaurs even have memory spans that great?

      6. The Suchomimus MAYBE could work, seeing how it was on Jurassic World’s species list, so it’s clear that InGen bred ’em for the park. But I doubt the other two will crop up. Especially Tarbosaurus; we already have 1 tyrannosaur to deal with, we don’t need another one.

      1. I honestly reassure you, you have the right to get involved, and for me, you are not at all an idiot. Thank you for your modesty!
        For these 6 details, I will explain them to you:
        1. For the introductory scene, I am not asking that it be 100% similar to the opening of JP3, but just with some similarities: like the 3 bars forming III appearing suddenly in the form of notches caused by claws. However, I do not give much importance.
        2. Blue meeting grant. Thank you very much for agreeing even if it is on certain details: certainly the resonance chamber of the raptors ultimately only served to confuse the JP3 raptors, but also because Alan Grant was just starting out, so there did not know their language completely, to know what to say to them, so that they would be spared. One of the raptors apparently tried to attack the group, or perhaps try to intervene since Alan Grant imitated the distress calls of one of their own as he had heard them, before the alpha female dissuaded him . In a deleted scene from Jurassic Park 3, it was planned that Alan would use the resonance chamber to call the velociraptors to fight and kill the spinosaurus. So why would this deleted scene not be repeated like it was done for most of the films “Jurassic Park” and “Jurassic World”? And how exactly would Blue ask for Grant’s help? Good question to which I recognize that my theories or ideas might not work, but these are only examples: -After Owen Grady taught Blue to trust Alan Grant and the latter saved this velociraptor, the latter might ask her for help in case she is in trouble;
        -Or that Blue gets stuck and Alan Grant helps him free her;
        3. For the return of the JP3 style raptors, I do not pretend to hold on so much to this hope; but what is it that says that all the male velociraptors of JP3 are completely exterminated and that there would not be some of them kept in secret after they would have been captured? Or that a few were cloned after recovering their DNA?
        4. For “Rex vs Spino revenge”, I know perfectly well that this debate is raging: it was indeed very difficult, for T-rex fans, to accept that a Spinosaurus killed a T-Rex in 2001, even still today. Something the fandom has a lot of trouble overcoming. Admittedly, he was not a known tyrannosaurus, like Rexy or Buck or Doe: just a random sub-adult male who was not powerful enough to beat the spino. I’m not asking that the spinosaurus be necessarily killed by the T-rex, but just beaten without being dead, hoping that the spinosaurus fans are not too upset. There is a petition on “”, and given the number of signatures, it would not be too surprising that this revenge is present in JW3, although it almost was in Fallen Kingdom.
        5. I’m not saying that Rexy would care about Alan or the others. She “inadvertently” saved them, by attacking the 2 raptors. Certainly she doesn’t care about people at all, let alone someone she tried to kill and eat more than 20 years ago. If tyrannosaurs even have such large expanses of memory? It’s not impossible. I am inspired by a scene in a comic (not canon) of Jurassic Park: “Jurassic Park Dangerous Game” where the T-rex (the same as that of Jurassic Park) judges humans if they are worthy of living or not (which would mean that she sees them well even if they do not move). Grant knows Tyrannosaurs well, so he knows how to survive.
        6. I admit that for the Tarbosaurus, I will be envious of it, but I agree with you for that, it would surprise me that it is present. Note another tyrannosaurus more would not necessarily be too much, especially if Rexy/Roberta died for example (which I hope so that it will not happen). After the pteranodons and dimorphodons, why wouldn’t they make another pterosaur, this time a giant like for example the ornithocheirus (even if it was not really 12 meters wide)?
        Even if there is still a lot to discuss, thank you for your indulgence.

      1. Judging from the list Newsweek put together in this article, based on the guesses found in the fans’ thread, I can say I like none of the options. Anyway, I care much more about the film than the title.

  5. Am I the only person who actually wished they just didnt give the films sub names? Why couldnt it just be Jurassic World, Jurassic World 2 and Jurassic World 3? Honestly… the added titles just seem pretentious.

  6. “New Era” eh? Could have been worse. Still don’t see a thriving population making too much of a dent in any ecosystem though.

    1. It isn’t just the wild dinosaurs they have to worry about; there’s lord-knows-how-many companies and organizations that have their hands on captive specimens and DNA samples, which means they’re probably going to have to contend with some bootleg dinosaurs in the film.

      On a side note, I’m hoping this is the movie where we’ll finally see BioSyn make its return. Probably not, but hey…I can dream, can’t I?

      1. They’ve pulled a “Noah’s Ark” on the Arcadia. N way they could fit more than a Dozen animals on that thing.

        And these other companies, are they going to be releasing their products into the wild? Why?

        How exactly is this “New Era” going to realistically come about?

        I just can’t buy it. But hey, it’ll look flashy. It always looks flashy.

        Story is what is desired from audience’s today though. Decent stories that make sense. Clever plots that people can talk about for years.

        Flashy is an orgasm. Over quick. Forgotten about by the next one.

        1. Out of random curiosity, what would YOUR clever plot be? If you’re so ashamed of the JW trilogy, then what would you have done different?

          And let me be clear here, I’m not saying that the JW movies are some groundbreaking storytelling. They’re not. That we can all agree on in some capacity. In fact, neither was the first movie, if you ask me. I actually like the original novel better than the movie as an overall story because it actually explores the flaws of the park and the implications of the dinosaurs’ breeding, and their potential to get out into the modern world, something that the original movie skimmed over. I get that they have to condense things because they only have a certain amount of time, but it’s something that’s really come to bug me in recent years.

          Sorry. Bit of a ramble there. But I digress. Believe me, I completely recognize the necessary value of a good plot. So I’m not dumb like that or anything.

          1. Honestly, I wouldn’t make a sequel. But if money ran my world and a large sum of it came my way to make one. Well, INGEN would have gone under, Sorna would have been left a nature reserve, BIOSYN would have hired Wu and opened at least two parks on the mainland. Only one of which would have involved a movie-worthy issue that led to Dinosaurs escaping into the wild, their subsequent cleanup and the introduction of Dinosaurs into everyday zoos around the world as the surviving escapees would have been donated to them. Moving forward you would have actual wildlife organisations maintaining the future of the various species while using the technology to replenish natural, modern animal populations around the world. In short, Dinosaurs would become intermingled in modern wildlife conservation.

            No hybrids. No military sub-plots. Just what Hammond would have wanted before he died.

      2. Fact is, BIOSYN was less than a Decade behind INGEN in the first film… The WORLD would already have what INGEN had back then by now without all this “open source” nonsense.

      3. @Ben (in regards to your story idea) I actually quite like this. I’m a little iffy on having BioSyn come out on top after everything, but other than that, I like this alternate take.

        And I find it kind of funny that both of us have ideas for alternative Jurassic stories that involve Dr. Wu, BioSyn, and a mainland installation (mine is an alternate version of Jurassic Park III). What are the odds?

        1. I dunno, I just came up with that off the top of my head. If I gave it more thought I suppose it would have it’s own issues, like what would happen to the park where nothing went wrong. What would happen to BIOSYN. What would happen to Wu… Still, no military sub-plots and dumb plot contrivances would ruin it like the paid professionals inserted into JW.

          1. Well for an idea that you made up off the top of your head, I’d say it’s a pretty good one.

            And I like how the genetics technology is now also being used to replenish modern life. I’ve always wondered why nobody suggests using it for something other than dinosaurs? It’s an idea that I’ve often thought we should be striving for in real life.

  7. There’s definitely some things I’d simply adore seeing in the next Jurassic World feature
    – Rexy and Blue getting married, Rexy goes out hunting while Blue moonlights as a freestyle rapper
    – the President of the United States being revealed as the Spinosaurus from JP3 in disguise the whole time, and getting into a boxing match with Rexy
    – a four way battle royale between the mosasaurus, a megalodon, a giant squid, and a pod of genetically engineered, pissed off orcas
    – The volcano eruption being revealed as a hoax perpetrated by a pack of velociraptors that have evolved super intelligence
    – Drs Grant, Sattler, and Malcolm defeating Wu and his army of ninjas with their sweet Kung fu moves while Owen watches on helplessly tied up and dressed as a damsel in distress
    – time traveling dinosaurs arrive to lend aid to their dying race, revealed to be an alien species from a distant galaxy
    – Franklin saves the day

    1. This is one of those story ideas that is objectively terrible, but is so fascinating in its lunacy that it becomes kind of an odd joy to watch. So bad its good.

      I know this is just a joke, but no lie, I would LOVE to see a spoof video of some kind that follows this plot, if only for the laughs.

  8. I looked in to “Paradise Lost” and i think it would actually be great. It’s a 400 year old poem detailing Satan, in the form of a dragon, being banished from heaven. (get it, cuz dragon). Also, Paradise Lost is a great summary of all the Jurassic books and films. And now instead of an island, it’s North America. Or the World. Or Big Rock National Park. Who knows. I still think its a good title.

    1. The problem is they aren’t going for a “Paradise Lost” theme this time, that was the last movie… They are seeking to make a utopia now.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More Episodes


What is your favourite Jurassic Park video game?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Jurassic Park Nightvision Goggles Replica